← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) (Meta) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsMuse Glimmer 30B (batch)Meta
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding92
Math92
Reasoning & Knowledge73
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperxAIMeta
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 9, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K131K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.35
Price — $/M output$6.00$1.50
Inputstext, image, filetext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%
Humanity's Last Exam43%
SciCode56%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.35 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.