← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi Corp) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi Corp
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156149
Coding9262
Math91
Reasoning & Knowledge7359
Agentic & Tools8474
Specifications
DeveloperxAIXiaomi Corp
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Apr 23, 2026
Parameters1T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K1.1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.43
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.87
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%87%
Humanity's Last Exam43%36%
SciCode56%51%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena16291476
WeirdML67%
τ²-bench94%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (149). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on input tokens at $0.43 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 62th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.