← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (inclusionAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsLing 3.0 Flash VLinclusionAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9247
Math91
Reasoning & Knowledge7342
Agentic & Tools84
Specifications
DeveloperxAIinclusionAI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Sep 10, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K131K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.06
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.18
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%86%
Humanity's Last Exam43%22%
SciCode56%44%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 47th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.