← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs Ling-3.0-flash

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Ling-3.0-flash () compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsLing-3.0-flash · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9235
Math92
Reasoning & Knowledge7342
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperxAI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Jul 23, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window500K262K
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.06
Price — $/M output$6.00$0.18
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%86%
Humanity's Last Exam43%24%
SciCode56%42%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Grok 4.6 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 35th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.