← All models
Compare

Grok 4.6 vs K-EXAONE 2.0

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and K-EXAONE 2.0 (LG AI Research) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the newsK-EXAONE 2.0LG AI Research
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding9233
Math91
Reasoning & Knowledge7329
Agentic & Tools84
Specifications
DeveloperxAILG AI Research
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Parameters750B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window500K
Price — $/M input$2.00
Price — $/M output$6.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%83%
Humanity's Last Exam43%19%
SciCode56%42%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or K-EXAONE 2.0?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.