← All models
Compare

GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-6 AstraOpenAI · 25 in the newsQwen3.5 397B-A17BAlibaba · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)169147
Coding9431
Math9542
Reasoning & Knowledge9938
Agentic & Tools9334
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAIAlibaba
FamilyGPTQwen
ReleasedSep 3, 2026Feb 15, 2026
Parameters397B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1.1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.39
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.34
Inputsfile, image, texttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%89%
APEX65%25%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-295%
GPQA Diamond96%86%
Humanity's Last Exam55%20%
SciCode56%42%
SimpleQA Verified76%
WebDev Arena1800
WeirdML94%
τ²-bench84%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Astra better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, GPT-6 Astra scores higher (169) than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.39 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

GPT-6 Astra supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-6 Astra ranks higher — 94th vs 31th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.