← All models
Compare

GPT-6 Astra vs Ling-3.0-flash

GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) and Ling-3.0-flash () compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGPT-6 AstraOpenAI · 17 in the newsLing-3.0-flash · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)169
Coding9534
Math96
Reasoning & Knowledge9941
Agentic & Tools96
Specifications
DeveloperOpenAI
FamilyGPT
ReleasedSep 3, 2026Jul 23, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1.1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.06
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.18
Inputsfile, image, texttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX47%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-295%
GPQA Diamond96%86%
Humanity's Last Exam55%24%
SciCode56%42%
SimpleQA Verified76%
WebDev Arena1797
WeirdML93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Ling-3.0-flash?

GPT-6 Astra supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6 Astra or Ling-3.0-flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-6 Astra ranks higher — 95th vs 34th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.