← All models
Compare

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.6

GLM-5.3-Flash (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) · 5 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)152156
Coding8392
Math6692
Reasoning & Knowledge5673
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)xAI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedAug 20, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters320B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1.3M500K
Price — $/M input$0.10$2.00
Price — $/M output$0.35$6.00
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202594%99%
GPQA Diamond90%94%
Humanity's Last Exam40%43%
SciCode52%56%
SimpleQA Verified32%49%
WebDev Arena16041629
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
SimpleBench76%
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than GLM-5.3-Flash (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3-Flash supports up to 1.3M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 83th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.