← All models
Compare

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.6

GLM-5.3-Flash (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) · 6 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)153157
Coding7485
Math4981
Reasoning & Knowledge5267
Agentic & Tools6888
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)xAI
Family—Grok
ReleasedAug 20, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters320B—
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.05$2.00
Price — $/M output$0.07$6.00
Inputstext, image, videotext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202594%99%
APEX53%65%
ARC-AGI91%88%
ARC-AGI-266%67%
GPQA Diamond90%94%
Humanity's Last Exam40%43%
SciCode52%56%
SimpleQA Verified32%49%
WebDev Arena16071618
SimpleBench—76%
WeirdML—67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (157) than GLM-5.3-Flash (153). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.05 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.3-Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 85th vs 74th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.