← All models
Compare

GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra

GLM-5.3-Flash (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) · 5 in the newsGPT-6 AstraOpenAI · 13 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)152169
Coding8395
Math6696
Reasoning & Knowledge5699
Agentic & Tools96
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)OpenAI
FamilyGPT
ReleasedAug 20, 2026Sep 3, 2026
Parameters320B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1.3M1.1M
Price — $/M input$0.10$10.00
Price — $/M output$0.35$50.00
Inputstext, image, videofile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202594%100%
GPQA Diamond90%96%
Humanity's Last Exam40%55%
SciCode52%56%
SimpleQA Verified32%76%
WebDev Arena16041797
APEX47%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-295%
WeirdML93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than GPT-6 Astra?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, GPT-6 Astra scores higher (169) than GLM-5.3-Flash (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

GLM-5.3-Flash supports up to 1.3M tokens, compared with 1.1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-6 Astra?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-6 Astra ranks higher — 95th vs 83th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.