← All models
Compare

GLM-5.2 vs Grok 4.6

GLM-5.2 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 20 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)152156
Coding8391
Math3393
Reasoning & Knowledge5976
Agentic & Tools8989
Specifications
DeveloperZ.ai (Zhipu AI)xAI
FamilyGrok
ReleasedJun 16, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.50$2.00
Price — $/M output$3.04$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202586%99%
APEX36%41%
ARC-AGI77%88%
ARC-AGI-223%67%
GPQA Diamond92%94%
Humanity's Last Exam41%43%
SciCode51%54%
SimpleQA Verified38%54%
SWE-bench Verified79%
WebDev Arena15931631
WeirdML70%67%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.2 better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than GLM-5.2 (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.2 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.50 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.2 or Grok 4.6?

GLM-5.2 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 91th vs 83th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.