← All models
Compare

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4.6

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMindGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)142156
Coding2086
Math1787
Reasoning & Knowledge1269
Agentic & Tools891
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGemmaGrok
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window—500K
Price — $/M input—$2.00
Price — $/M output—$6.00
Inputs—text, image, file
Outputs—text
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202582%99%
GPQA Diamond73%94%
Humanity's Last Exam19%43%
SciCode40%56%
WebDev Arena13611618
WeirdML35%67%
τ²-bench44%—
APEX—65%
ARC-AGI—88%
ARC-AGI-2—67%
SimpleBench—76%
SimpleQA Verified—49%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than Gemma 4 26B A4B (142). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 86th vs 20th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.