← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Step 3.7 Flash (StepFun) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsStep 3.7 FlashStepFun
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding8842
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge8224
Agentic & Tools9497
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindStepFun
FamilyGemini—
ReleasedAug 13, 2026May 29, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.20
Price — $/M output$3.75$1.15
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%81%
Humanity's Last Exam39%21%
SciCode60%44%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—
τ²-bench—99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 42th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.