← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Ring-2.6-1T (Ant Group) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsRing-2.6-1TAnt Group
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding8846
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge8233
Agentic & Tools9462
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAnt Group
FamilyGemini—
ReleasedAug 13, 2026May 14, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.07
Price — $/M output$3.75$0.63
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%86%
Humanity's Last Exam39%22%
SciCode60%45%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—
τ²-bench—92%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Ring-2.6-1T?

Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Ring-2.6-1T?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Ring-2.6-1T?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 46th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.