← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding8878
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge8285
Agentic & Tools94—
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Aug 8, 2026
Parameters—2.4T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$2.00
Price — $/M output$3.75$6.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%94%
Humanity's Last Exam39%42%
SciCode60%54%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 78th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.