← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Qwen3.7-Plus (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157148
Coding8848
Math7352
Reasoning & Knowledge8257
Agentic & Tools9465
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
FamilyGeminiQwen
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jun 3, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.32
Price — $/M output$3.75$1.28
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%93%
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%88%
Humanity's Last Exam39%36%
SciCode60%46%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—
τ²-bench—93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7-Plus?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher (157) than Qwen3.7-Plus (148). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.32 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 48th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.