← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding9198
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge8597
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindXiaomi
FamilyGemini
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.43
Price — $/M output$3.75$0.87
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image, video, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX68%
ARC-AGI96%
ARC-AGI-285%
GPQA Diamond95%
Humanity's Last Exam39%49%
SciCode60%61%
SimpleQA Verified69%
WebDev Arena1587

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on input tokens at $0.43 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher — 98th vs 91th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.