← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hy3

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Hy3 (Tencent) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsHy3Tencent
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding8856
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge8158
Agentic & Tools94—
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindTencent
FamilyGemini—
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.13
Price — $/M output$3.75$0.53
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%90%
Humanity's Last Exam39%34%
SciCode60%49%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hy3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hy3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 56th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.