← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157156
Coding8886
Math7387
Reasoning & Knowledge8269
Agentic & Tools9491
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGeminiGrok
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.75$2.00
Price — $/M output$3.75$6.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%99%
APEX68%65%
ARC-AGI96%88%
ARC-AGI-285%67%
GPQA Diamond95%94%
Humanity's Last Exam39%43%
SciCode60%56%
SimpleQA Verified69%49%
WebDev Arena15871618
SimpleBench—76%
WeirdML—67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher (157) than Grok 4.6 (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 86th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.