← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna (batch)

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and GPT-6 Luna (batch) (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGPT-6 Luna (batch)OpenAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding91
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge85
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGeminiGPT
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.05
Price — $/M output$3.75$0.25
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiofile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX68%
ARC-AGI96%
ARC-AGI-285%
GPQA Diamond95%
Humanity's Last Exam39%
SciCode60%
SimpleQA Verified69%
WebDev Arena1587

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-6 Luna (batch)?

GPT-6 Luna (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.05 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-6 Luna (batch)?

GPT-6 Luna (batch) supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.