← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding8998
Math7491
Reasoning & Knowledge8298
Agentic & Tools9585
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGeminiGPT
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 29, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$2.00
Price — $/M output$3.75$10.00
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiofile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%100%
APEX68%60%
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%95%
Humanity's Last Exam39%—
SciCode60%—
SimpleQA Verified69%74%
WebDev Arena15871759

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher — 98th vs 89th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.