← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and GLM-5.3 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 12 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157155
Coding8890
Math7344
Reasoning & Knowledge8267
Agentic & Tools9479
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyGemini—
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Parameters—744B
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.06
Price — $/M output$3.75$2.86
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%91%
APEX68%57%
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%91%
Humanity's Last Exam39%42%
SciCode60%59%
SimpleQA Verified69%41%
WebDev Arena15871614
WeirdML—75%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GLM-5.3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher (157) than GLM-5.3 (155). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, GLM-5.3 ranks higher — 90th vs 88th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.