← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.2 (batch)

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and GLM 5.2 (batch) (Z.ai) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGLM 5.2 (batch)Z.ai
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157—
Coding88—
Math73—
Reasoning & Knowledge82—
Agentic & Tools94—
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai
FamilyGemini—
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jun 16, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.75$0.70
Price — $/M output$3.75$2.20
Inputstext, image, video, file, audiotext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%—
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%—
Humanity's Last Exam39%—
SciCode60%—
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena1587—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM 5.2 (batch)?

GLM 5.2 (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.70 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM 5.2 (batch)?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.