← All models
Compare

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) and Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the newsGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157142
Coding8820
Math7317
Reasoning & Knowledge8212
Agentic & Tools948
Specifications
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindGoogle DeepMind
FamilyGeminiGemma
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Apr 2, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M—
Price — $/M input$0.75—
Price — $/M output$3.75—
Inputstext, image, video, file, audio—
Outputstext—
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%82%
APEX68%—
ARC-AGI96%—
ARC-AGI-285%—
GPQA Diamond95%73%
Humanity's Last Exam39%19%
SciCode60%40%
SimpleQA Verified69%—
WebDev Arena15871361
WeirdML—35%
τ²-bench—44%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher (157) than Gemma 4 26B A4B (142). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher — 88th vs 20th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.