← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Trinity Large Thinking

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Trinity Large Thinking (Arcee AI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsTrinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding7818
Math88
Reasoning & Knowledge7019
Agentic & Tools58
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekArcee AI
FamilyDeepSeek
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.25
Price — $/M output$1.74$0.80
Inputstexttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%75%
Humanity's Last Exam41%16%
SciCode51%41%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena15821238
WeirdML66%
τ²-bench90%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper on input tokens at $0.25 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Trinity Large Thinking?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 18th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.