← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Qwen3.7 Flash (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsQwen3.7 FlashAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155145
Coding78
Math8834
Reasoning & Knowledge7027
Agentic & Tools
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jul 27, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.03
Price — $/M output$1.74$0.13
Inputstexttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%87%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%82%
Humanity's Last Exam41%
SciCode51%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena1582
WeirdML66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores higher (155) than Qwen3.7 Flash (145). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.03 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.