← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen3.5-2B

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Qwen3.5-2B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsQwen3.5-2BAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding780
Math88
Reasoning & Knowledge700
Agentic & Tools21
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Feb 24, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)Open weights (restricted use)
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$0.58
Price — $/M output$1.74
Inputstext
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%46%
Humanity's Last Exam41%3%
SciCode51%3%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena1582
WeirdML66%
τ²-bench69%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.5-2B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 0th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.