← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen 3.8 27B

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Qwen 3.8 27B (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsQwen 3.8 27BAlibaba · 9 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding7872
Math88
Reasoning & Knowledge7068
Agentic & Tools
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)Open weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.42
Price — $/M output$1.74$3.00
Inputstexttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%91%
Humanity's Last Exam41%34%
SciCode51%47%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena15821595
WeirdML66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.42 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 72th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.