← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Ling 3.0 Flash VL (inclusionAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsLing 3.0 Flash VLinclusionAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding7847
Math88
Reasoning & Knowledge6942
Agentic & Tools
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekinclusionAI
FamilyDeepSeek
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 10, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M131K
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.06
Price — $/M output$1.74$0.18
Inputstexttext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%86%
Humanity's Last Exam41%22%
SciCode51%44%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena1582
WeirdML66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 47th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.