← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Ling-3.0-flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Ling-3.0-flash () compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsLing-3.0-flash · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding7835
Math88
Reasoning & Knowledge7042
Agentic & Tools
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeek
FamilyDeepSeek
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Jul 23, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.06
Price — $/M output$1.74$0.18
Inputstexttext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%86%
Humanity's Last Exam41%24%
SciCode51%42%
SimpleQA Verified53%
WebDev Arena1582
WeirdML66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling-3.0-flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 35th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.