DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs GLM-5.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and GLM-5.1 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 155 vs 150).
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper on input tokens — $0.58 vs $1.19 per 1M.
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has a larger context window (1M vs 205K tokens).
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher for coding (78th vs 49th percentile).
| Attribute | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 155 | 150 |
| Coding | 78 | 49 |
| Math | 88 | 57 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 69 | 46 |
| Agentic & Tools | — | 94 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | DeepSeek | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) |
| Family | DeepSeek | — |
| Released | Aug 13, 2026 | Apr 7, 2026 |
| Parameters | 1.6T | 754B |
| Availability | Open weights (unrestricted) | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Price — $/M input | $0.58 | $1.19 |
| Price — $/M output | $1.74 | $3.74 |
| Inputs | text | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 99% | 93% |
| ARC-AGI | 91% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 92% | 90% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 41% | 30% |
| SciCode | 51% | 45% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 53% | 34% |
| WebDev Arena | 1582 | 1509 |
| WeirdML | 66% | 57% |
| FrontierMath | — | 33% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 13% |
| SimpleBench | — | 55% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74% |
| τ²-bench | — | 98% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 better than GLM-5.1?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores higher (155) than GLM-5.1 (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.1?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.58 per million, versus $1.19 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.1?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5.1?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 49th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.