← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the newsGemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)155
Coding7887
Math8890
Reasoning & Knowledge7095
Agentic & Tools
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekGoogle DeepMind
FamilyDeepSeekGemini
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$0.58$0.75
Price — $/M output$1.74$3.75
Inputstexttext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202599%99%
ARC-AGI91%
ARC-AGI-261%
GPQA Diamond92%95%
Humanity's Last Exam41%48%
SciCode51%57%
SimpleQA Verified53%70%
WebDev Arena15821567
WeirdML66%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.58 per million, versus $0.75 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher — 87th vs 78th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.