DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 155 vs 143).
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper on input tokens — $0.30 vs $0.58 per 1M.
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher for coding (78th vs 17th percentile).
| Attribute | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 155 | 143 |
| Coding | 78 | 17 |
| Math | 89 | 16 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 70 | 15 |
| Agentic & Tools | — | 3 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | DeepSeek | Google DeepMind |
| Family | DeepSeek | Gemini |
| Released | Aug 13, 2026 | Sep 25, 2025 |
| Parameters | 1.6T | — |
| Availability | Open weights (unrestricted) | API access |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | $0.58 | $0.30 |
| Price — $/M output | $1.74 | $2.50 |
| Inputs | text | file, image, text, audio, video |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 99% | 73% |
| ARC-AGI | 91% | 33% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61% | 3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 92% | 79% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 41% | 12% |
| SciCode | 51% | 39% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 53% | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1582 | — |
| WeirdML | 66% | 42% |
| APEX | — | 2% |
| FrontierMath | — | 5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 70% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83% |
| SimpleBench | — | 41% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 17% |
| τ²-bench | — | 32% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores higher (155) than Gemini 2.5 Flash (143). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $0.58 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ranks higher — 78th vs 17th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.