← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek-V4-Flash (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek · 11 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)146156
Coding3392
Math91
Reasoning & Knowledge3673
Agentic & Tools7884
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedApr 24, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters284B
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.07$2.00
Price — $/M output$0.17$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
APEX35%41%
GPQA Diamond87%94%
Humanity's Last Exam30%43%
SciCode40%56%
SimpleBench46%76%
WebDev Arena14311629
WeirdML46%67%
τ²-bench96%
AIME 2024/202599%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
SimpleQA Verified49%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (156) than DeepSeek-V4-Flash (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.