← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 12 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156157
Coding7585
Math7281
Reasoning & Knowledge6067
Agentic & Tools4388
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedSep 9, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters552B—
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.04$2.00
Price — $/M output$0.38$6.00
Inputstext, imagetext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202598%99%
APEX40%65%
ARC-AGI95%88%
ARC-AGI-273%67%
GPQA Diamond90%94%
Humanity's Last Exam39%43%
SciCode52%56%
SimpleQA Verified43%49%
WebDev Arena16141618
SimpleBench—76%
WeirdML—67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores higher (157) than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (156). The right pick depends on your task, so compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.04 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 ranks higher across coding benchmarks like WebDev Arena and SciCode: 85th vs 75th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.