← All models
Compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 2 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding7492
Math92
Reasoning & Knowledge7573
Agentic & Tools85
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$0.30$2.00
Price — $/M output$1.20$6.00
Inputstext, imagetext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam39%43%
SciCode52%56%
AIME 2024/202599%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
GPQA Diamond94%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 74th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.