← All models
Compare

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusDeepSeekGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)156
Coding3592
Math5092
Reasoning & Knowledge3973
Agentic & Tools1184
Specifications
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepSeekGrok
ReleasedSep 22, 2025Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityOpen weights (unrestricted)API access
Context window164K500K
Price — $/M input$0.27$2.00
Price — $/M output$1.00$6.00
Inputstexttext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202590%99%
GPQA Diamond79%94%
Humanity's Last Exam16%43%
LiveCodeBench80%
MMLU-Pro85%
SciCode38%56%
τ²-bench37%
APEX41%
ARC-AGI88%
ARC-AGI-267%
SimpleBench76%
SimpleQA Verified49%
WebDev Arena1629
WeirdML67%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.27 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 supports up to 500K tokens, compared with 164K for the other.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Grok 4.6 ranks higher — 92th vs 35th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.