← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · 2 in the newsGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—157
Coding9689
Math9174
Reasoning & Knowledge7682
Agentic & Tools10095
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.75
Price — $/M output$10.00$3.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%97%
APEX76%68%
GPQA Diamond96%95%
SimpleQA Verified47%69%
WebDev Arena16991587
ARC-AGI—96%
ARC-AGI-2—85%
Humanity's Last Exam—39%
SciCode—60%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher — 96th vs 89th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.