← All models
Compare

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)AnthropicGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)—157
Coding—89
Math—74
Reasoning & Knowledge—82
Agentic & Tools—95
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Parameters——
Availability—API access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$1.00$0.75
Price — $/M output$5.00$3.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025—97%
APEX—68%
ARC-AGI—96%
ARC-AGI-2—85%
GPQA Diamond—95%
Humanity's Last Exam—39%
SciCode—60%
SimpleQA Verified—69%
WebDev Arena—1587

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $1.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.