← All models
Compare

Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Opus 5.5 (batch)AnthropicGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)157
Coding91
Math80
Reasoning & Knowledge85
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$2.00$0.75
Price — $/M output$10.00$3.75
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/202597%
APEX68%
ARC-AGI96%
ARC-AGI-285%
GPQA Diamond95%
Humanity's Last Exam39%
SciCode60%
SimpleQA Verified69%
WebDev Arena1587

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.75 per million, versus $2.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.