← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 4

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Solar Pro 4 (Upstage) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsSolar Pro 4Upstage
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163—
Coding9144
Math91—
Reasoning & Knowledge8652
Agentic & Tools92—
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicUpstage
FamilyClaude—
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 10, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI access—
Context window1M524K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.03
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.12
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%—
APEX64%—
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-289%—
GPQA Diamond86%89%
GSO (code optimization)78%—
Humanity's Last Exam56%29%
SciCode61%45%
SimpleBench82%—
SimpleQA Verified71%—
WebDev Arena1628—
WeirdML92%—
τ²-bench99%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.03 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Solar Pro 4?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 524K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Solar Pro 4?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 91th vs 44th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.