← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3-Max-Thinking

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3-Max-Thinking (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsQwen3-Max-ThinkingAlibaba · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9955
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge9656
Agentic & Tools9840
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jan 25, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.78
Price — $/M output$50.00$3.90
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%86%
Humanity's Last Exam53%26%
SciCode60%43%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%84%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max-Thinking?

Qwen3-Max-Thinking is cheaper on input tokens at $0.78 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max-Thinking?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max-Thinking?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 55th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.