← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3-Max

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3-Max (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsQwen3-MaxAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161144
Coding9935
Math9527
Reasoning & Knowledge9645
Agentic & Tools9828
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 5, 2025
Parameters1T
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.78
Price — $/M output$50.00$3.90
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%73%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%73%
Humanity's Last Exam53%11%
SciCode60%38%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%67%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%74%
LiveCodeBench77%
MATH Level 597%
MMLU-Pro84%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen3-Max?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Qwen3-Max (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?

Qwen3-Max is cheaper on input tokens at $0.78 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 35th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.