← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3-Coder-Next (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsQwen3-Coder-NextAlibaba · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding998
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge969
Agentic & Tools9833
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Feb 2, 2026
Parameters80B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.11
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.80
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%74%
Humanity's Last Exam53%9%
SciCode60%32%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%34%
τ²-bench99%80%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Qwen3-Coder-Next is cheaper on input tokens at $0.11 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 8th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.