← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3.7-Plus (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 47 in the newsQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba · 3 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162148
Coding9857
Math9762
Reasoning & Knowledge9065
Agentic & Tools9867
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jun 2, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.32
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.28
Inputstext, image, filetext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%93%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%88%
Humanity's Last Exam56%36%
SciCode60%46%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%93%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen3.7-Plus?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (162) than Qwen3.7-Plus (148). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.32 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 57th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.