← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.6 Flash

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen 3.6 Flash (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsQwen 3.6 FlashAlibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161144
Coding99
Math9519
Reasoning & Knowledge9622
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.19
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.13
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%86%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam53%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench82%35%
SimpleQA Verified68%21%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%
FrontierMath10%
FrontierMath Tier 40%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen 3.6 Flash?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Qwen 3.6 Flash (144). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Qwen 3.6 Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.19 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.6 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.