← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (Alibaba) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsQwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)Alibaba
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161147
Coding9941
Math9525
Reasoning & Knowledge9633
Agentic & Tools9827
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
FamilyClaudeQwen
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Feb 16, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$10.00
Price — $/M output$50.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%85%
APEX45%14%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam53%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%26%
WebDev Arena16541393
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%
FrontierMath21%
FrontierMath Tier 42%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 41th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.