← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B (NVIDIA) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsNemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding99
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge96
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicNVIDIA
FamilyClaudeNemotron
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Dec 15, 2025
Parameters31.6B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.05
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.20
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%
Humanity's Last Exam53%
SciCode60%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?

Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B is cheaper on input tokens at $0.05 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.