← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsMiniMax-M3MiniMax
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163147
Coding9659
Math969
Reasoning & Knowledge8952
Agentic & Tools9653
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMiniMax
FamilyClaudeMiniMax
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jun 1, 2026
Parameters428B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.28
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.10
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%71%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%91%
Humanity's Last Exam56%39%
SciCode61%47%
SimpleBench82%46%
SimpleQA Verified71%
WebDev Arena16261488
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%89%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiniMax-M3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than MiniMax-M3 (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.28 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 59th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.