← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M2.7

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax-M2.7 (MiniMax) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsMiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161146
Coding9955
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge9644
Agentic & Tools9846
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMiniMax
FamilyClaudeMiniMax
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Mar 18, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (non-commercial)
Context window1M205K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.25
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.00
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%87%
Humanity's Last Exam53%28%
SciCode60%47%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena16541401
WeirdML92%37%
τ²-bench99%85%
Terminal-Bench45%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than MiniMax-M2.7 (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.25 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.7?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.7?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 55th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.