← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M2.5

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax-M2.5 (MiniMax) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsMiniMax-M2.5MiniMax
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163147
Coding9634
Math96
Reasoning & Knowledge8923
Agentic & Tools9641
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMiniMax
FamilyClaudeMiniMax
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Feb 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M205K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.27
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.95
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%6%
ARC-AGI99%64%
ARC-AGI-289%5%
GPQA Diamond86%85%
Humanity's Last Exam56%21%
SciCode61%43%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified71%
WebDev Arena16261384
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%95%
Terminal-Bench43%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiniMax-M2.5?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than MiniMax-M2.5 (147). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.27 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.5?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.5?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 34th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.