← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M2.1

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax-M2.1 (MiniMax) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsMiniMax-M2.1MiniMax
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9943
Math9525
Reasoning & Knowledge9659
Agentic & Tools9840
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMiniMax
FamilyClaudeMiniMax
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Dec 23, 2025
Parameters229B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window1M205K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.30
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.20
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%83%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%83%
Humanity's Last Exam53%22%
SciCode60%41%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena16541392
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%85%
LiveCodeBench81%
MMLU-Pro88%
Terminal-Bench37%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.1?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax-M2.1?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 43th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.